E E S T I   T U R N I I R I B R I D Ž I   L I I T
P A A R I D E   S I M U L T A A N   -   2 6 . 0 2 . 2 0 1 8
G E N E R E E R I T U D   :   2 8 . 0 2 . 2 0 1 8   2 0 : 0 6 : 5 0
RESULTS PRODUCED BY VAMBOLA KASE - BRIDGE CALCULATIONS PROGRAM
25 Mikelsaar, Raik-Hiio SUMMA PLACE
Viil, Martin 41,95% 94.
B O A R D P-NS NS R-NS CNT P TR L R-EW EW P-EW SCORE OPPONENTS
1 12,5 25   6♠ W = 9 980 37 95,5 11,57% Nirk-Riisalu SUMMA
2 37,4 25 620 4♠ S = ♠T   37 70,6 34,63% Nirk-Riisalu
3 87,2 36   3Nt W = 2 600 25 20,8 19,26% Klaos-Kalma
4 36,4 36   1 W +1 ♣5 110 25 71,6 66,30% Klaos-Kalma HOME
5 73,7 25 620 4 S = ♠5   35 34,3 68,24% Palm-Lainemäe
6 4,2 25   5♣ N -1 ♠8 50 35 103,8 3,89% Palm-Lainemäe
7 13,5 25   5 N -1 ♠A 100 34 94,5 12,50% Vähk-Vähk PREV
8 55,0 25   6 E = ♣7 980 34 53,0 50,93% Vähk-Vähk
9 89,3 25 100 3Nt W -1 ♠5   33 18,7 82,69% Ruus-Tungel
10 53,0 25 100 4♣ E -1 K   33 55,0 49,07% Ruus-Tungel NEXT
11 77,9 25 430 3Nt S +1 7   32 30,1 72,13% Taube-Zalitis
12 61,3 25 690 3Nt N +3 ♣T   32 46,7 56,76% Taube-Zalitis
13 105,9 25 730 3♠x S = A   24 2,1 98,06% Saks-Ulp END
14 27,0 25   3 E = T 140 24 81,0 25,00% Saks-Ulp
15 32,2 25   3♠ E = 6 140 42 75,8 29,81% Elismäe-Prieditis
16 58,2 25   4 W = A 620 42 49,8 53,89% Elismäe-Prieditis
17 8,3 25   3♣ N -3 A 150 41 99,7 7,69% Tenn-Jullis
18 58,2 25   3Nt W +1 ♣2 430 41 49,8 53,89% Tenn-Jullis
19 20,8 25 150 3♣ S +2 ♠A   40 87,2 19,26% Vasar-Zvorovski
20 1,1 25   2 E = 4 110 40 106,9 1,02% Vasar-Zvorovski
21 103,8 25 160 1♠x N = A   39 4,2 96,11% Pauman-Iher
22 17,7 25   3Nt E +1 2 630 39 90,3 16,39% Pauman-Iher
23 62,3 25 100 3H W -1 SA -100 38 45,7 57,69% Tani-Lellep
24 21,8 25 -490 3NT W +3 S9 490 38 86,2 20,21% Tani-Lellep